Class Action Cases

Uxin Limited

Join Class Action »

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Uxin was presumably planning to stop offering complimentary services to customers including inspections. The Company planned on having dealers provide these services to consumers on a complimentary basis. This change was likely to negatively impact Unix’s 2B business model. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Uxin, investors suffered damages.

Press Release

IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against Uxin Limited and Encourages Investors with Losses in Excess of $100,000 to Contact the Firm

Los Angeles, January 31, 2019 — The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Uxin Limited (“Uxin” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: UXIN) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s shares pursuant to and/or traceable to Uxin’s Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) on June 27, 2018, are encouraged to contact the firm before March 30, 2019.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall, or Sherin Mahdavian, of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Uxin was presumably planning to stop offering complimentary services to customers including inspections. The Company planned on having dealers provide these services to consumers on a complimentary basis. This change was likely to negatively impact Unix’s 2B business model. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Uxin, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:
The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
Sherin Mahdavian, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
Cell: 424-303-1964
info@schallfirm.com

SOURCE:
The Schall Law Firm