Class Action Cases

NIO Inc.

Join Class Action »

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. NIO made no effort to build a manufacturing facility for its electric vehicles, instead relying on an obscure manufacturer owned by the Chinese government, JAC Auto, to build its products. The government’s reduction of subsidies for electric vehicles negatively impacted the Company’s sales. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about NIO, investors suffered damages.

Press Release

IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against NIO Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses in Excess of $100,000 to Contact the Firm

Los Angeles, March 12, 2019 — The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against NIO Inc. (“NIO” or “the Company”) (NYSE: NIO) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s shares between September 12, 2018 and March 5, 2019, inclusive (the ”Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before May 13, 2019.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall, or Sherin Mahdavian, of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. NIO made no effort to build a manufacturing facility for its electric vehicles, instead relying on an obscure manufacturer owned by the Chinese government, JAC Auto, to build its products. The government’s reduction of subsidies for electric vehicles negatively impacted the Company’s sales. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about NIO, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:
The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
Sherin Mahdavian, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
Cell: 424-303-1964
info@schallfirm.com

SOURCE:
The Schall Law Firm

Cases

  • Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: xls, xlsx, doc, pdf, jpg, jpeg, Max. file size: 32 MB, Max. files: 5.
      You may redact your account numbers from your uploaded documents. The Schall Law Firm is committed to protecting the privacy of confidential information. Your documents will be securely held in AWS S3 and will only be used as proof of your transactions in connection with this matter.
    • Purchases
      MM slash DD slash YYYY
      If fractional shares, please round to the nearest whole number.
    • Sales
      MM slash DD slash YYYY
    • By submitting your information, you acknowledge that this form does not create an attorney-client relationship between yourself and The Schall Law Firm. Any information you submit will be maintained as confidential. The Schall Law Firm, in its sole discretion, will contact you if it requires further information from you.