Class Action Cases

Join the case to recover your losses. Click "Join this Class Action" above.

Attorneys

Coty Inc.

Join Class Action »

Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse facts about Coty’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose: (1) that despite being no stranger to beauty brand acquisitions, Coty did not have adequate processes and procedures in place to assess and properly value the P&G Specialty Beauty Business and Kylie Cosmetics acquisitions; (2) that as a result, Coty had overpaid for the P&G Specialty Beauty Business and Kylie Cosmetics; (3) that Coty did not have adequate infrastructure to smoothly integrate and support the beauty brands that it acquired from P&G, including an adequate supply chain; (4) that,as a result of its inadequate infrastructure, Coty was not successfully integrating the beauty brands it acquired from P&G and not delivering synergies from the acquisition; (5) and that, as a result of the foregoing, Coty’s financial statements and Defendants’ statements about Coty’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.

Press Release

SHAREHOLDER ACTION ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filinges of a Class Action LawsSuit Against Coty Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses in Excess of $100,000 to Contact the Firm

Los Angeles, September 4, 2020 — The Schall Law FirmThe Schall Law FirmThe Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm,  and Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP announces announced today the filingthat they have it filed of a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of plaintiff Crystal Garrett-Evans against Coty Inc. (“Coty” or “the Company”) (NYSE: COTY) and certain of its officers.  The class action, filed in the Southern District of New York, captioned Garrett-Evans v. Coty Inc., et. al., and docketed under Case No. 20-cv-07277, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Coty securities between October 3, 2016 and May 28, 2020, inclusive (the ”Class Period”). Plaintiff seeks to recover compensable damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

For violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The This action , was filed in the Southern District of New York and is captioned Garrett-Evans v. Coty Inc., et. al., No. 20-cv-07277 (S.D.N.Y.). It , is brought on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired Coty securities between October 3, 2016 and May 28, 2020, inclusive (the ”Class Period”).

If you are a shareholder who purchased Coty securities during the Class Period, you have until November 3, 2020 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse facts about Coty’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose: (1) that despite being no stranger to beauty brand acquisitions, Coty did not have adequate processes and procedures in place to assess and properly value the P&G Specialty Beauty Business and Kylie Cosmetics acquisitions; (2) that as a result, Coty had overpaid for the P&G Specialty Beauty Business and Kylie Cosmetics; (3) that Coty did not have adequate infrastructure to smoothly integrate and support the beauty brands that it acquired from P&G, including an adequate supply chain; (4) that,as a result of its inadequate infrastructure, Coty was not successfully integrating the beauty brands it acquired from P&G and not delivering synergies from the acquisition; (5) and that, as a result of the foregoing, Coty’s financial statements and Defendants’ statements about Coty’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com

Office: 310-301-3335

info@schallfirm.com

Cases

  • Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: xls, xlsx, doc, pdf, jpg, jpeg.
    You may redact your account numbers from your uploaded documents. The Schall Law Firm is committed to protecting the privacy of confidential information. Your documents will be securely held in AWS S3 and will only be used as proof of your transactions in connection with this matter.
  • Purchases
    Date Format: MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • Sales
    Date Format: MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • By submitting your information, you acknowledge that this form does not create an attorney-client relationship between yourself and The Schall Law Firm. Any information you submit will be maintained as confidential. The Schall Law Firm, in its sole discretion, will contact you if it requires further information from you.